Wikipedia:Taverna/2006

Nota

Pagina archivate

Iste pagina es un archivo historic. Per favor non modifica le contento in iste pagina. Dirige qualcunque commentario additional al pagina de discussion currente.

Isto es un archivo de commentos facite in le Taverna in 2006. Per favor non lo modifica. Face le modificationes in Wikipedia:Taverna.

Le activitates proponite in le taverna es in Wikipedia:Activitates pendente.

Archivo

• Archivos del Taverna: Special:Indice de prefixos/Wikipedia:Taverna/

Official dictionary

I don't see tamben in the www.interlingua.com dictionary. I know the usage from Spanish. Is tamben official ? There is a lot of usage here at the interlingua wikipedia and I am thinking of replacing this with etiam. There seems to be other unofficial interlingua words.--Jondel 00:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Non pote io vider tamben in le www.interlingua.com dictionario. Io sape lo de usante de espaniol. Es tamben official o non? On habe usate plus ici de interlingua wikipedia e pensante replacerlo cum etiam. Me sembla que existe plus parolas interlingua nonofficial.--Jondel 00:56, 29 decembre 2005 (UTC)

tamben non es official, ma alcun interlinguistas prominente includente Ingvar Stenström lo usa. Le parolas "official" e "non-official" totevia non vermente existe in interlingua, solmente le methodo de derivation del parolas es official. - Martijn 16:23, 18 decembre 2006 (UTC)

Vandalismo

Un usator, [1], ha cambiate paginas de usatores e discussiones. /Phenice 18:25, 4 januario 2006 (UTC)

Es non esseva intention de vandalismo solo corregir le interlingua . Il debe saper o informa que es unvandalismo modificar paginas de usator. Es melior que ille registra.--Jondel 01:28, 5 januario 2006 (UTC)

Pardono!

Io presenta mi excusas. Io es un novicio in Wikipedia e non sapeva que on non pote cambiar tal paginas. Io ha solmente corrigite alcun errores grammatical, proque io suffre de vider interlingua tanto maltractate. Mi excusas. Io non plus cambiara le paginas que tu ha indicate. Mi excusas. Io non es un vandalo. Salutes cordial.

Continua si ille vos place. Io es un novicio de interlingua. Te adjuta si vos vole. Corrige solo le paginas de articulo non le paginas de discussion et non de paginas de usator. Le modification de pagina de usator es un vandalismo.--Jondel 00:57, 5 januario 2006 (UTC)

Si ille vos place registra como usator. Te adjuta. Nos te necessito tus adjutas. --Jondel 01:29, 5 januario 2006 (UTC)

Non modificara le disussiones de altera persona si ille vos place. Tamben es un violation.--Jondel 01:42, 5 januario 2006 (UTC)

Io comprehende nunc que tu non ha le intention de vandalisar, e tu excusas es naturalmente acceptate! Si ille vos place, continua abona le articulos! /Phenice 21:49, 6 januario 2006 (UTC)

BON ANNO!!

BON ANNO A TOTES INTERLINGUISTAS!!!

Nonne alicuno hic? Non? Hmmmm--Jondel 04:19, 5 januario 2006 (UTC)

Usator:Chlewbot (bot de interwikis)

es: He estado corriendo un bot de enlaces interidiomas (interwiki) en varias Wikipedias, incluyendo esta. El bot utiliza código pywikipedia, el cual mantengo actualizado con CVS. Las contribuciones del mismo pueden verse aquí.

Si no hay objeciones, estoy solicitando el status de bot en meta. Gracias.

— Chlewey 17:40, 16 januario 2006 (UTC)

en: I have been running an interlanguage links bot (interwiki bot) in several Wikipedias, including this one. The bot uses pywikikpedia code, which I keep updated via CVS. The bot contributions can be seen here.

If there are no objections, I am asking for bot status in meta. Thank you.

— Chlewey 23:26, 24 januario 2006 (UTC)

(mal) ia: Io ha estado executanto un bot de referencias inter linguas (interwikis) in multe Wikipedias, hic includenta. Le bot usa code pywikipedia, que io hava actual via CVS. Les contributions de le bot ese hic.

Si non ese objectiones, io requesta le status de bot in meta. Gracie.

— Chlewey 23:26, 24 januario 2006 (UTC)

Meliorar Dictionario

Ad totes io volerea invitar redacter et meliorar le dictionario wikipedia de interlingua ecce (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Basic_Interlingua_English_Dictionary). Gratias.--Jondel 07:28, 19 januario 2006 (UTC)

Authoritate

The language is so natural it seems to write itself. However, a governing body really is needed. (It is sad that Interlingua is not too popular as eo). People are just creating their words. Here at the ia wiki, someone created the word Thequondo . I think the original word Taekwondo should be retained since it is more popular known this way.

Le lingua es tan natural , il semble scriber ipse . Mais, il es necessitate, un corpore governante (Es un pietate interlingua non es popular como eo). Gentes es justo creante lor parolas. Hic, al ia wikipedia. alicuno create le parola e articulo Thequondo. Io crede le parola Taekwondo debe esser retenite quod es plus cognoscite sicut.--Jondel 00:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Disputes

I work in a Japanese publications company and we edit out or delete parts like 'in a law suit between Microsoft and Sun etc.'. Most Japanese are not interested in conflicts but harmony. In the same way, could those who are more senior or longer here, tone down your disputes. I mean it paralyzes some of us. We or I don't want to take sides. Besides, there are sooo few of us interlinguists. We can't afford to have these disputes.--Jondel 00:43, 12 junio 2006 (UTC)

OK, I don't like disputes like that either next time I will try not to get involved. Jcb 21:14, 12 junio 2006 (UTC)

Sysop promotion

Gratias pro vostre supporto. Io promitte servir ben.--Jondel 00:48, 12 junio 2006 (UTC)

Frontispicio

Belle nove disegno! Multe gratias a McDutchie pro le labor ben! (I hope this is more or less understandable Interlingua?) Jcb 21:19, 12 junio 2006 (UTC)

Gratias! E si, tu interlingua es ben comprensibile. Solmente duo correctiones: disegno => designo; labor ben => labor bon. Martijn 01:48, 30 junio 2006 (UTC)

Laudes a McDutchie! Le frontispico e superbe!--Jondel 23:23, 12 junio 2006 (UTC)

Gratias Jondel. Martijn 01:48, 30 junio 2006 (UTC)

Le guardianes del aqua

Elimina nos? Es encyclopedic?--Jondel 06:48, 16 junio 2006 (UTC)

Iste articulo non solmente non pertine a un encyclopedia, ma sembla anque esser un violation de copyright del World Wildlife Fund. Io lo ha eliminate. – Martijn 16:22, 21 julio 2006 (UTC)

Nove parolas

Iste parolas es jam usante o necessitate. Igitur va io a suggestionar a interlingua-coollist@yahoogroups.com e www.interlingua.com.

• tamben
• compartemento behaviour
• besoniar
• chavacano
• taekwondo
• squid ->*calamar o teuthida
• porce salvage (wild boar)
• calamar o teuthida (squid)
• lege o juris (law)

--Jondel 01:53, 10 julio 2006 (UTC)

"comportamento" (non compartemento), "besoniar", "porco" (non porce), "salvage" e "lege" non es nove parolas. Esque tu ha un bon dictionario de interlingua? Si non, io haberea suggestiones pro te, si tu ha interesse. - Martijn 16:14, 21 julio 2006 (UTC)

Solo io non poteva trovar in www.interlingua.com , per exemplo besoniar o tamben. Io besonia dictionario online. io nunc es usante de espaniol de argentina-interlingua e bowks.net/worldlang/aux/b_IED.html .Le dictionarios de tu suggestiones , non es on line? Gratias.--Jondel 00:12, 22 julio 2006 (UTC)

Ordine del interwikis

Io discorda con le facto que alcun bots ordina le ligamines interlingua in iste Wikipedia secundo le etymologia de interlingua (anglese, francese, italiano, espaniol, portugese, germano, russo, e latino ante le alteres). Ante que io modificarea iste regula aqui, io ama haber le supporto de alteres aqui. -- Dissident (Discussion) 16:35, 1 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Personalmente io pensava que le prioritisation del linguas de controlo de Interlingua facilita le comparation inter le linguas, le derivation de nove terminologia in interlingua quando necessari, e le traduction de articulos in Interlingua. Quales es tu rationes pro non esser de accordo con isto? – Martijn 09:25, 9 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Io sape que le Wikipedia interlingua non es exactemente indispensabile, mais si uno vole que iste encyclopedia es considerate esser seriose, uno debe comprender que illo existe primarimente pro su lectores e non pro su scriptores. Un nonalphabetic lista de altere linguas non es professional e es confundente pro le lectores. In plus, le selection del linguas que esseva date prioritate es alquanto minus del optimo; russo ha(beva) quasi completemente necun influentia super le derivation de parolas de interlingua, mais del altere parte un lingua como catalano e su parolas grandemente resimila interlingua e esserea plus utile como un del primemente mentionate linguas. -- Dissident (Discussion) 23:07, 9 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Io pensava que alphabetic ordine, como in altere Wikipedia esserea ben. De mi parte modificarea iste regula. (I like the alphabetic order, link in other Wikipedia. I agree we should change this). Jcb 22:37, 16 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Haben modificate le software del robot. Jcb 23:38, 1 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Io ha personalmente un preferentia pro le ordine que se basa super le nomines del linguas in le linguas mesme e non super lor codices (vide aqui). -- Dissident (Discussion) 01:32, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Io pode intentar le modificar en le robot. Jcb 08:52, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Les developeres del robot deben modificar le. Alteres le soporten? Io ha personalmente un preferentia pro le ordine que se basa super los codices. Jcb 10:16, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Uno non pote expectar que un lector normal sape le codice de un lingua. -- Dissident (Discussion) 00:35, 8 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Pro "Alphabetic lista de altere linguas"

1. Jcb 22:37, 16 augusto 2006 (UTC)
2. ...

Pro "secundo le etymologia de interlingua"

1. ....

Thijs!bot

Hello, I am Thijs! from the Netherlands. i would like to request a bot flag for my bot Thijs!bot. It uses pywikipedia and will do over-night runs where it changes unambigious links. Ambigious links are only done in manual mode, where I check them myself. As a start the bot uses Flacus' warnfiles and the Dutch wikipedia. Currently the bot runs on more than 50 wikipedia's among which almost all with more than 10.000 articles. Thijs! 21:18, 6 augusto 2006 (UTC)

• Si I have good experiences with your botruns on several Wikis. Jcb 23:09, 7 augusto 2006 (UTC)
• Stop, ante que tu bot recipe un classification de bot io primarimente vole vider que le question in alto concernente le ordine del interwikis placiate per bots es regulate. -- Dissident (Discussion) 01:21, 8 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I stopped my bot temporarily. The discussion above has not really started, though. So an outcome can take a while. How long should I wait? If there is no progress on it in a week, or if there has been a conclusion, I would like to start my bot again. Thijs!bot 09:33, 8 augusto 2006 (UTC)

We already have some bots running the same software which already have a bot flag, so there shouldn't be fundamental problems with them. Multi-logon Interwiki-robots are worldwide accepted and prefered above single-logon robots. The only remaining question should be: "does this particular user run his bot well?" As far as I know, this is an experienced bot user, doing his work well, so there shouldn't be any problem. Jcb 21:50, 8 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Hello. The above discussion about the link order is still inconclusive, and this one appears to be as well. If I get no further objections, I will start the bot work on ia: again shortly. Thijs!bot 13:00, 25 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Please don't start. Your bot seems to use the order which is being disliked by both dissident and I. Please don't use that order. Jcb 22:58, 26 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Hello JCB> What do you suggest? Waiting for another month? Why place a moratorium on the usage of bots, when there is no solution of the problem in sight? However, it is not my problem that links on ia: are missing. Do you mind if I only do manual changes to solve conflicts with other wikipedia's? This will come down to max. 10 edits on a very busy day, to 0 edits for a week when I have less time. Thijs!bot 22:23, 27 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Hi Thijs, I would suggest to wait. Your bot uses the wrong order. Don't worry about the interwiki, i've planned to do a bot run next monday. Jcb 23:13, 31 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Hi. How do you handle the link order? Do you use another platform than the pywikipedia? Or have you implemented the link order in it yourself. Can you then tell me at which line of the script this is handled, so I might change my bot myself? Thijs!bot 20:30, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

The robot developers just made a patch yesterday, so the only thing you have to do is get the latest version at CVS. Jcb 20:42, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

I did so and started my bot today. Thanks! Thijs!bot 21:27, 4 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Illo sembla bon. Stato de bot accordate. -- Dissident (Discussion) 03:21, 9 septembre 2006 (UTC)

TuvicBot

I would like a bot flag to run my interwiki-bot TuvicBot (using Pywikipedia). This bot will run in manually assisted mode, adding and updating interwiki-links, using the Dutch wiki as a starting point. I'm mostly planning to solve interwikis that autonomous bot skip because they're ambigious. (And sorry for not speaking in your language :-() A list with wikis where TuvicBot has bot status can be found at nl:Gebruiker:TuvicBot/Bot-status, if you're interested.

I'm posting this here, because I couldn't find a local approval page. --Tuvic 19:05, 15 augusto 2006 (UTC)

If nobody has objections, I'll start the bot tomorrow. --Tuvic 13:52, 25 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Please start a test run of about 50 edits, so that we can see if the edits are OK, The problem is that we are debating about the order. Both dissident and I dislike the order of the latest pywikipedia version. Please make sure that your bot leaves the interwikis in alphabetic order instead of putting some above. Jcb 23:01, 26 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I've added ia to the list. Problem is that I'm working on dates right now, and you wiki only has them from up to 1700 or so. It might take a few days until I get there. However, I've made a test-edit at the article about Russia. Please take a look, and then report what is incorrect about the interwiki-order. As far as I can see, the bot sorts it now as follows: en','fr','it','es','pt','de','ru','la' first, and then the rest alphabetically. (I've reordened my bot, because pywikipedia is a little bit out of date, alphabetically, that is) --Tuvic 12:20, 27 augusto 2006 (UTC)

So, is the order correct? Can I proceed, or should I alter something? --Tuvic 09:22, 30 augusto 2006 (UTC)

No, the order is wrong. As I requested above on 26 august - 23:01, please keep the alphabetic order. Jcb 23:10, 31 augusto 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I've updated my bot, and double-checked it, and it now puts the interwikis in alphabetic order of the language-code. Sorry for the misunderstanding at first. I'll make a few edits now, so you can double-check. --Tuvic 13:47, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

I was faster :-) I already dropped a message to your Dutch discussion page that it's OK now. Greeting, Jcb 13:48, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Indeed you did. I'll repeat my answer here: I'll do a couple of edits today, and then I'll (probably) wait until bot-status can be given, so I won't disturb the recent-changes list too much. If I do run the bot I'll try to keep the edit count under control. --Tuvic 13:56, 2 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Recomencia vostre bot per favor. Postea un consideration correcte pote esser facite. -- Dissident (Discussion) 02:58, 9 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Illo sembla bon. Stato de bot accordate. -- Dissident (Discussion) 23:56, 21 februario 2007 (UTC)

Le question del posto de bureaucrate

Proque il es obvie ora que un active bureaucrate es requirite aqui e io difficilemente pote demandar le posto pro me mesme e simultaneemente opponer lo pro Jcb, io finira le impasse, lassara cader mi objection contra su application, e demandara statos de bureaucrate pro nos ambe a meta con le conditiones sequente:

1. Jcb recognosce que haber discussiones concernente un altere Wikipedia e in un differente lingua, que es non mesmo anglese, esseva un seriose falta.
2. Strictissime proceduras concernente le uso de poteres de bureaucrate es establite, publicate, e adherite a.

Io equalmente cordialmente requesta que Jcb al minus tentara conversar in interlingua pro demonstrar su devotion a iste Wikipedia, proque il esserea improprie esser tanto importante como un bureaucrate e non mesmo usar le lingua del Wikipedia. Facer errores de grammatica es obviemente non mal si le tentativa es sincer.

Quanto a usator 24.70.95.206, io releva iste responsa que io dava ante.

Il equalmente esserea gentil haber un consenso on le question in alto super le ordine del interwikis, proque illo pertine le bots que require classificationes de bot de un bureaucrate. -- Dissident (Discussion) 02:46, 16 augusto 2006 (UTC)

I will try to use more Interlingua. For here I hope you don't care that I'm using English, to avoid misunderstandings. You ask me to admit that it was wrong to discuss a NL.wikipedia-related topic here at IA. Well, it was probably not the best place, but I got permission in advance from two stewards. However, remember that that happened in march 2005, which is more than a year ago. After that, it didn't happen anymore. The next time I would use META for things like that.

About the last thing I'm not sure if I exactly understand. As far as I understand you ask me to wait for the results of the discussion, before granting botstatus to users. Well, that's no problem. A burocrat has to serve the community and NOT to take decisions on his own. Greetings, Jcb 22:24, 16 augusto 2006 (UTC)

User:Escarbot

Bonjour,

Je suis un wikipedien français fr:User:Vargenau (ou je suis admistrateur), ici User:Vargenau, et je demande l'autorisation d'utiliser le robot User:Escarbot.

Ce robot sera utilisé uniquement pour faire des interwikis (avec pywikipedia interwiki.py).

J'ai déjà le statut de robot sur fr: nl: sr: ht: da: pt: is: it: li: sv: sk: na: be: ja: ro: lb: zh-min-nan: de: bg: bs: la: mk: hr: pl: ru: fa: eo: tr: ku:

Vous pouvez voir les modifications que j'ai faites avec le robot sur Special:Contributions/Escarbot.

Merci d'avance.

Hello,

I am a French Wikpedian fr:User:Vargenau (where I am sysop), here User:Vargenau, and I ask for permission to use robot User:Escarbot.

This robot will only be used to make interwikis (using pywikipedia interwiki.py). I already have robot status on fr: nl: sr: ht: da: pt: is: it: li: sv: sk: na: be: ja: ro: lb: zh-min-nan: de: bg: bs: la: mk: hr: pl: ru: fa: eo: tr: ku:

You can check the edit already made by my bot in Special:Contributions/Escarbot

Thank you for your support

Vargenau 11:06, 3 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Illo sembla bon. Stato de bot accordate. -- Dissident (Discussion) 02:47, 9 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Merci/Thank you. Vargenau 19:29, 13 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Pro totes que ha problemas con le grammatica de interlingua

Proque modificar un message de alcuno sin permission pote esser considerate como rude, mais de altere parte alcuno darea le benvenita a illo, io ha create iste patrono que uno pote poner super su pagina de usator per adder {{permission de corriger}}. -- Dissident (Discussion) 13:53, 3 septembre 2006 (UTC)

Wikimania 2007 Team Bulletin

Published by the Wikimania 2007 Taipei Team, Wikimania 2007 Team Bulletin provides the latest news of the Team's organizing work to everyone who is interested in Wikimania; it also gives the Team chances to announce calls for help/participation, so assistance in human and other resources can be sought in a wider range. Team Bulletin is published at the official website of Wikimania 2007 and released to the public domain. Issue 1 and Issue 2 has already published.--218.166.212.246 01:57, 29 octobre 2006 (UTC)

Audio

Car omnes, io ha facite un parve experimento con audio. Vide Patrono:Audio, Bulla de Auro e Guerra. Que pensa vos? – Martijn 16:13, 13 decembre 2006 (UTC)

Multo interessante! De iste maniera nos pote leger e ascoltar interlingua. In facto, io ha descoperite que alicun parolas se pronuncia un pauc distincte de como io pensava. Julian 10:48, 30 januario 2007 (UTC)

Congratulationes! --André Oliva 00:24, 6 martio 2007 (UTC)

Felice anno nove

Con isto io vole augurar a tote le interlinguistas e wikipedistas un felice anno nove e bon fortuna durante le anno 2007. Martijn 11:53, 2 januario 2007 (UTC)

Common.css

Salute! Il esserea possibile adder regulas al css MediaWiki:Common.css? Io facera patronos pro paises e territorios usante '.infobox' e '.infobox.geography' del css del version anglese. Notscott 06:14, 14 januario 2007 (UTC)

JAnDbot

Please for bot flag for my bot. It's interwiki bot working on cs:, it does non-controversial automatic interwiki addiction, but his main domain is human assisted problematical interwiki (this operation is working on about 200 languages at same time, but maximal about 20 pages per day).

Sometimes this bot do standard interwiki addiction, but only in the languages with bot flag.

Bot is based on pywikipedia. Already with bot status in about 40 languages, including almost all from top20: cs, eo, sl, pl, de, sr, hr, da, en, el, es, it, sk, sh, vec, ro, no, ... (see here Awaiting for bot: some more languages.

If you have any question, please write it to my discuss page JAnDbot 13:19, 17 januario 2007 (UTC) / JAn

Illo sembla bon. Stato de bot accordate. -- Dissident (Discussion) 23:00, 21 februario 2007 (UTC)

Articulos de opinion religiose

Le usator 190.10.0.110 ha demandate le elimination de multe paginas. Le argumento esseva que illos esseva subjective. Le articulos, in facto, non es objective, e isto non es encyclopedic. Comocunque, io pensa que non es correcte demandar un elimination rapide de iste articulos proque illos non es spam, sin senso o vacue. Mithridates ha suggerite in Proque le Biblia? facer un section pro le articulos. Io ha create le categoria Opinion religiose ubi io ha locate le articulos mentionate. Julian 10:32, 30 januario 2007 (UTC)

Considera que iste es un encyclopedia e debe nos mantene articulos de natura encyclopedic.----Jondel 13:59, 30 januario 2007 (UTC)

Si - solmente un nove categoria non es sufficiente, proque le contente integre es partial. Le articles debe esser movite a un altere article, en un section nove super "opiniones de credentes super le biblia" o un titulo similar. Mithridates 16:17, 30 januario 2007 (UTC)

Le idea de Mithridates me sembla bon. De tote formas, io pensa que le articulos debe esser objective. Que opina le alteres? Julian 22:35, 1 februario 2007 (UTC)

Hallo! Mi nomine es André Oliva. Io esseva le usator 190.10.0.110. Io vole apprender Interlingua. Io parla espaniol. Io pensa que le articulos super (sobre, about) opiniones religiosas pote esser parte de le articulo super Biblia. Il debe esser objective.--André Oliva 00:11, 2 februario 2007 (UTC)

Io opina que quasi TOTE le contento in Categoria:Essayos e contos debe esser eliminate como nonencyclopedic e proque illos es violationes de derectos de autor. E io plana facer aquello. -- Dissident (Discussion) 08:11, 27 februario 2007 (UTC)

Io es de accordo con te, Dissident, gratias. --Jmb 15:46, 27 februario 2007 (UTC)

Io propone que on applica un allerta special al articulos con opiniones religiose (simile al allerta de "stubs"). Isto pote esser un allerta del contento subjective del articulo, con un invitation al lector a facer le articulo plus neutral. --Jmb 16:12, 27 februario 2007 (UTC)

Il non es un problema haber articulos super opiniones religiose a condition que iste opiniones es ascribite a fontes e iste es notabile. Ergo, lo que nos ha aqui es un simple problema de puncto de vista neutral.-- Dissident (Discussion) 06:01, 28 februario 2007 (UTC)

Io pensa que nos ha un problema con le articulos de opinion religiose, ma io pensa, etiam, que nos debe laborar pro facer de iste articulos (le articulos que debe esser parte de Wikipedia, no "Essayos" ni "Contos") articulos neutral, que ha omne le punctos de vista de le differente religiones. Io pensa que le articulos que es essayos o contos non debe esser parte de Wikipedia. Nota: Io pensa que le articulos del categoria: Dictionario de Theologia etiam non debe esser parte de Wikipedia, si non de Wiktionary, proque illos solmente ha un definition del thema. Nos necessita laborar multo pro meliorar le articulos de iste categoria que si es encyclopedic.--André Oliva 00:02, 1 martio 2007 (UTC)

Nove designo de frontispicio

Salute! Io ha facite un nove designo pro le frontispicio. Illo es in Frontispicio:experimental. Que opina vos? Julian 17:35, 19 februario 2007 (UTC)

---

Commentos de INTERLNG scribite per alteres:

1. Illo me place multo! Complimentos! Un bon labor!
2. Iste nove pagina me place multo. Que nos informara le membros de nostre organisationes que illes debe comenciar studiar Wikipedia plus sovente e si possibile scriber nove textos ibi. In le jornales quotidian svedese on nunc sovente vide referentias a Wikipedia que ha devenite un encyclopedia extense e un fonte de cognoscentia importante. Si il ha ligamines a textos in interlingua nos disperge le cognoscentia del lingua lo que vermente es necessari. Ancora troppo multe personas non mesmo cognosce le existentia de iste lingua.
3. Ben io senti de ser tan sincer sed io non ama multe le nove frontispicio. Como tu sape ben io ama multe le frontispicio Italian que ha colores clar e iconos con color. In le nove frontispicio ia lo que io non ama es le color orange forte, le titulos es parve et le testa de littera non es centrate, equalmente inter quatratos il ha grande spatio vacue. Io lo senti sed io es secur que on pote facer melior. Regretabilemente io non cognoce le programma pro facer le cambios necessari. : /

Mithridates 01:25, 20 februario 2007 (UTC)

---

Salute Dave! Gratias per tu adjuta con le lista INTERLNG. Io ha facite alicun cambios in le Frontispicio:experimental. Illos es:

• le spatio vacue inter tabellas es minor
• le colores es plus clar
• le fonte de littera del titulos es plus grande

Io spera que iste nove version es plus belle pro totes.

Salute, Julian 18:26, 20 februario 2007 (UTC)

---

Salute! Io jam ha ponite le nove Frontispicio. Amicalmente, Julian 17:27, 21 februario 2007 (UTC)

Colores del spatios de nomine

Si alcuno vole un altere color de fundo a alcun spatios de nomine (o un altere action associate con CSS o JavaScript), on pote requestar lo aqui. -- Dissident (Discussion) 00:01, 23 februario 2007 (UTC)

Normas de Wikipedia

Io pensa que debe haber un articulo super le forma correcte de scriber articulos, pro evitar que illos sia scribite como le articulos in le Categoria "Wikificar". Per exemplo, vide le articulo Biblia. --André Oliva 01:01, 4 martio 2007 (UTC)

Mover le taverna de 2006

Salute! Io volerea mover iste articulo a "Wikipedia:Taverna 2006" e crear un pagina nove pro le "Wikipedia:Taverna" (2007), con le contento de 2007 de iste pagina, ab le titulo "Audio". Alicuno non es de accordo? Julian 14:15, 22 martio 2007 (UTC)